
You know how it goes. A draft goes out. Comments come back.
Some are sharp, some ‘make it pop’, and one is from someone who didn’t read past the first paragraph.
Three rounds later, the deck is better, but nobody could tell you why it improved or how to avoid the edits next time.
Fixing it comes down to three things: agreeing on how you’ll work together before the pressure comes, having a shared language for feedback that’s neither too vague nor too in-the-weeds, and treating the feedback as a habit rather than a quarterly event.
Laying out clear expectations from the get-go will front-end the thinking, cut rework and lift the quality of insights you and your team deliver.
Here are three ideas for making that happen.
Agree on a structured way to collaborate on key communication.
In my experience, preparing formal communication slips into the general to-and-fro of ‘work’, rather than being completed as part of a clear working arrangement. The drafting, reviewing and reworking go with a kind of organic flow that gets a bit pressured the closer the deadline looms. It doesn’t have to be this way.
Laying out clear expectations from the get-go will front-end the thinking, cut rework and lift the quality of the insights you and your team deliver.
Provide clear and specific feedback.
Once you’ve agreed on how you’ll work together, the next question is what good feedback actually looks like. Avoid giving feedback that is too vague or too specific. Neither is helpful.
Feedback that is too vague goes a bit like this: ‘tighten the messaging and be more direct’, or perhaps ‘focus on the audience more’.
Feedback that is too specific looks like this: ‘Avoid em dashes; it looks like AI wrote it,’ or ‘The CEO doesn’t like that word,’ or perhaps ‘Stop joining complete sentences with a comma.’
Instead, you want to have a way to be both specific and also get above the minutiae. I use my SCORE framework to do that:
- Set the scene quickly by drawing the audience toward one insightful message
- Convey the right balance of strategic and operational detail
- Organise the ideas in a well-structured hierarchy
- Ready the audience for a productive discussion
- Engage the audience using a medium, style and tone that suits them
Give quality feedback regularly.
Frameworks are only any good if they are used. Instead of holding off until someone’s quarterly review, take a few moments to regularly point out what is working, what’s not and to nudge people to keep growing. This could be commenting on an insightful email, an obvious lift in clarity in a doc of some kind or sitting down with someone to walk through why you changed their draft.
Do this consistently, and feedback stops being something people brace for and starts being a valuable tool that lifts the quality of thinking and writing within your team.
More soon,
Davina
PS. I know: last week I shared the only 7 frameworks you need to know and left this one out. D’oh.
Want to communicate better?
Clarity First's courses help you structure your thinking so you engage decision-makers better.
RELATED POSTS
Clear isn’t the same as compelling
2 critical ingredients for improving your communication
Giving hard feedback
The Roman decision-making trick that isn’t Roman or a trick
Addition bias – why your messages aren’t landing
Why your messages aren’t landing might come down to one bias: addition. Here’s the simple fix that changed how IKEA’s teams worked.
High-signal communication
How do you craft presentations that have a high signal-to-noise ratio that your audience can easily understand? Here are 3 strategies.

ABOUT AUTHOR: DAVINA STANLEY
Davina helps senior leaders and their teams prepare high-quality papers and presentations in a fraction of the time, nailing the message that engages decision makers fast.
She learned structured thinking at McKinsey in Hong Kong in the 1990s, was approved to teach the Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto in 2009, and has coached leaders and teams globally for 25+ years. Clients report cutting review cycles by ~30% and prep time by ~20%.*
Recent clients include 7Eleven, KPMG, Mercer, Meta, and Woolworths.
Learn more at www.clarityfirstprogram.com
* Based on 2023 client benchmarking results.







