Today I step into dangerous territory.
Over the summer I completed a fabulous online course called The Art of Reading.
One of the modules encouraged us to think critically about what we read and gave ideas on how to do that.
One item that stood out to me was the idea of the narrative fallacy.
I think the the course author, Shane Parrish is right.
There is something important at stake here for us when we prepare our communication.
The fallacy suggests that we are all wired for story – so far so good.
However, the challenge comes in creating our own narratives to justify things that have already happened, or predicting what will happen in the future.
Shane suggested that using story, rather than facts and logical reasoning, to create our view of the world and to make decisions is not only dangerous, but more common than we realise.
This is something that at Clarity First we wholeheartedly agree with.
Story is central to engaging busy audiences in complex information. Humanising it can also go a long way to doing that.
However, ‘story' – sometimes also referred to as ‘narrative – can be dangerous if not used well.
Shane's article The Narrative Fallacy suggests that although narrative makes us feel better, but is often a sham.
For example, Steve Jobs was told that because his adoptive father was a detailed-oriented engineer and craftsman, Steve Jobs also paid extra attention to the fine details of Apple designs. He denies this is the case, claiming his own personality and motivations as being more important drivers.
He was also asked whether his quest for perfection came from an idea that he needed to prove himself, given he had been adopted out. He claimed this was patently false, and that his adoptive parents made him feel special regardless of what he achieved.
Nassim Taleb (author of The Black Swan) had a similar story, and fact checked his hunch that his professor had no justification in attributing his ability to see luck and to separate cause and effect to his Lebanese heritage.
Click the link below for suggestions to help you think critically and assess whether a narrative can be trusted to accurately draw cause and effect links or whether it is just a great story.
>> Click here to read more <<
If you want to take these ideas a step further to learn how to tell a story that is both logically sound AND engaging, click here to learn more about the Clarity First Program.
This month by month program enables you to learn at your own pace as you work towards turning your communication skills into an asset.
Keywords: critical thinking, storytelling
PRESENTED BY DAVINA STANLEY
Davina has helped smart people all over the world clarify and communicate complex ideas for 20+ years.
She began this work when she joined McKinsey & Company as a communication specialist in Hong Kong where she helped others use the Minto Pyramid PrincipleⓇ.
She continued helping others when living in New York, Tokyo and now back in Australia where she was approved by Barbara Minto herself to teach Pyramid.
Her clients include experts across many disciplines across Australia, Asia Pacific, New Zealand, the UK and the US. She currently coaches a number of C-suite executives as well as many mid-level folk and the occasional graduate.
Get her 4 Tips for Communicating Complex Ideas here.